Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Conveyor Tail Drive

  1. #1

    Conveyor Tail Drive

    What are the pros and cons of adding the tail drive as a means of adding additional required HP to the conveyor with the existing head drives for large capacity conveyor

  2. Dear Andrew,

    The inclusion of additional drive at tail end will need redesigning the conveyor i.e. new tensions at various points and consequent changes in forces acting at head end structure, tail end structure, take-up, pulleys, belt etc. Then one has to see existing which items will remain unchanged and which items will change. This analysis can be done by conveyor designer for arriving at reliable solution. The quantum of changes will depend upon magnitude of power at tail end in comparison to existing power at head end. If the additional drive is very small compared to existing drive, it will need changes in very few items.

    The new tensions will also need checking of concave convex radius at various points and if these need revisions, then it will demand reconstruction of the structures.

    There is no quick-fix solution.

    Regards,
    Ishwar G Mulani.
    Author of Book : Engineering Science and Application Design for Belt Conveyor.
    Email : parimul@pn2.vsnl.net.in
    Tel.: 0091 (0)20 5882916

  3. #3
    Lawrence K. Nordell

    Lawrence K. Nordell

    President and CEO

    Conveyor Dynamics Inc. [eDir]

    Conveyor Dynamics Inc.

    Professional Experience 58 Years / 8 Month Lawrence K. Nordell has 58 Years and 8 Month professional experience

    Discussions 2608 Lawrence K. Nordell acceded to 2608 discussions, Articles 0 Lawrence K. Nordell wrote 0 articles, Publications 0 Lawrence K. Nordell Nordell released 0 publications

    Searching nothing specified

    Know-How Design (1521) Lawrence K. Nordell used this tag 1521 times, Pipe Conveyor (238) Lawrence K. Nordell used this tag 238 times, Chutes (119) Lawrence K. Nordell used this tag 119 times

    In addition to the above:

    You will also need to check for belt sag near the tail ( assuming a horizontal profile) or along its profile, if you have a low point away from the tail.

    Drive slip (head and tail) and related takeup tension, to control both drive slip and belt sag, needs to be evaluated.

    You will need to check for the alteration of starting and stopping dynamics. Depending on the conveyor's length, the starting timing may need to be phase corrected due to the time delay of the elastic wave response, between head and tail, during its stretching cycle. This may alter the velocity or torque starting curve relationship between head and tail.

    Lawrence Nordell
    Conveyor Dynamics, Inc.

  4. Dear Andrew..
    Can you give us an indication of the configuration of the conveyor in question?
    For example, if it is an incline conveyor, the tension at the tail will be at its lowest, and there would more than likely be no point in putting in a tail drive at all.
    If it is an overland conveyor, the rule of thumb is that the power of the tail drive should be sufficient to overcome the return friction and any return belt lift. This means that the conveyor would normally have to be quite long to justify a tail drive and be able to benefit from it. (unless of course it is a dual carry conveyor)
    You mention that it is a large capacity conveyor, and therefore probably has large head drives. This implies that the power to drive the return belt could be relatively insignificant, and a tail drive would probably not be worth the effort.
    You must remember that a tail drive requires additional electrics, as well as co-ordination and control of the drives a long distance apart, and requires the control of potential transients as Larry Nordell mentioned above.
    In other words we have to establish the magnitude of any benefits by analising the configuration and duty before potentially complicating your conveyor with a tail drive.

    Regards
    Graham Spriggs
    LSL Consulting / Tekpro Projects
    Johannesburg
    Graham Spriggs

  5. #5

    Conveyor Tail Drive

    Thanks to all for your comments.
    Our existing conveyor is approximately 2400 m long, with zero lift, has 4 X 1250 HP drives at the head end and one 1250 HP tail drive. We are considering adding an additional 250 HP to the tail drive and wonder what are the pros and cons of doing it. Would adding the extra power be more advisable at the head end or tail end?
    We have been having some problems with sharing the power between both the head and tail drives due to uneven build up on the pulleys and resulting slippage of the belt at the tail end. It was recommended by our engineers that we use the VFD at the tail end to control the sharing of power and transient between the tail and head drives. However we have no experience with VFD in such application. Has this been done before and what is your experience with it?
    Andrew

  6. Dear Mr. Andrew,

    You have mentioned that there is a slippage between belt and pulley at tail end. This is a serious matter and it signifies inadequate tension in the belt. Kindly examine this point when incorporating any proposition.

    As mentioned earlier, it is advisable that the competent designer should check the design in totality, so that you do not have any problem after rectification instead of changes based on possibilities.

    Regards,
    Ishwar G Mulani.
    Author of Book : Engineering Science and Application Design for Belt Conveyor.
    Email : parimul@pn2.vsnl.net.in
    Tel.: 0091 (0)20 5882916

  7. #7
    Lawrence K. Nordell

    Lawrence K. Nordell

    President and CEO

    Conveyor Dynamics Inc. [eDir]

    Conveyor Dynamics Inc.

    Professional Experience 58 Years / 8 Month Lawrence K. Nordell has 58 Years and 8 Month professional experience

    Discussions 2608 Lawrence K. Nordell acceded to 2608 discussions, Articles 0 Lawrence K. Nordell wrote 0 articles, Publications 0 Lawrence K. Nordell Nordell released 0 publications

    Searching nothing specified

    Know-How Design (1521) Lawrence K. Nordell used this tag 1521 times, Pipe Conveyor (238) Lawrence K. Nordell used this tag 238 times, Chutes (119) Lawrence K. Nordell used this tag 119 times

    Andrew,

    Conveyor Dynamics, Inc. (CDI) has done what you seek to do. We have applied load sharing to inverters, wound rotor motors, and fluid couplings located at head and tail drive arrangements for long single flight overlands up to 16 km.

    I am sure the problems are solvable.

    We have worked in Ft. McMurray. I do not think the next step should be generalized in this forum. There are too many issues that need discussion and analysis as Mr. Mulani suggests.

    If you wish to discuss such in detail please call or email me. We are about 1 hour by air, from Edmonton or Calgary. I can fly out of Vancouver on the day of your choice. Catch the local flight to Ft. McMurray and see you the same day.

    Lawrence Nordell
    Conveyor Dynamics, Inc.
    1111 West Holly St.
    Bellingham, WA 98225
    ph: 360-671-2200
    fx: 360-671-8450
    email: nordell@conveyor-dynamics.com
    website: www.conveyor-dynamics.com

  8. Good morning Andrew..
    Could you please confirm your conveyor duty/arrangement.
    You seem to have enough power there to move 30 000t/h !!
    2400m is not very long, and as you indicate there is no lift, but you have 6250 HP on board. Seems too much. Also, what and where is your take up system?
    To answer your other question, any additional power should be applied to the primary head drive pulley. This is the one closest to the material discharging from the belt. (Why you want more than 6250 HP... I have no idea.)
    Anyway for interest, if we do our maths, we find that on a dual drive system with two adjacent drive pulleys of equal wrap, the primary drive pulley can transmit 3 x that of the secondary, at a normal value of the coefficient of friction. Additional power on the tail drive would therefore not be correct at all.

    Regards
    Graham Spriggs
    LSL Consulting / Tekpro Projects
    Johannesburg
    gspriggs@global.co.za
    Graham Spriggs

  9. #9

    Conveyor Tail Drive

    Good Morning Gentlemen,
    responding specifically to Graham, you are in SA and we are in North Alberta, Canada, in quite opposite climate and here we are handling the oilsand in temperatures down to - 40 C. Our ore is very sticky with significant build up on all conveyor components and surfaces increasing significantly overall friction resistance to run conveyor.
    We have been operating here for some 25 years up to ~45 km of conveyors and contrary to conventional wisdoms (like CEMA) we need a lot more power to move our conveyors.
    The conveyor in question is only 2400 m lg and with 6500 HP to be installed we expect ~ 9500 TPH in summer and ~8000 TPH in winter from 72"/1800 mm belt at 4.57 m/s. It sounds like not a big deal but it's in our environment.
    Our current occasional HP restrictions, new proposed configuration of the conveyor and higher expected production has lead us to proposed upgrade from 6250 to 6500 HP. And that's were we are now wondering if the proposed method of installing VFD to the existing but upgraded tail drive to 1500 HP is optimum. And also we wonder if anyone has any experience running the VFD controlled tail drive, regards, Andrew

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 20th April 2005, 13:59
  2. Drive Parts Requirement
    By S.M.SUBRA in forum New Projects, Tenders, Inquiries
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26th May 2003, 16:33
  3. Dust-controlled, Drive-over Lime Hopper
    By KenPavlich in forum Silos, Hoppers, Bins, Bunkers & Domes
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 16th April 2003, 16:20
  4. Dual Drive for Belt Conveyors
    By vishy in forum Trough Belt Conveying
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 21st February 2003, 18:16
  5. Screwconveyor drive motor sizing
    By Vincent in forum Solutions for Screws, Segregation & Solids Flow
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 30th May 2002, 0:40

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO