Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: How to Increase the Angle of an Inclined Belt

  1. How to increase angle of an inclined belt

    The experimental rig which was built in the
    the Ben-Gurion University of Negev showed
    that it is possible to increase angle of a
    conveyor slope more than it is
    recommended in the technical
    literature.
    The increase can be reached either (a) by
    the reduction of the conveyor speed
    to 1.5-1.8m/s or (b) by the reduction
    of a conveyor load (cross section of
    the material) to 55%-65% from
    the nominal load.
    Depending on the angle of repose,
    angle of surcharge and
    flowability of a material, from 2 to 4
    grad can be added to the
    recommended slope angle.

  2. Dr. M Rivkin,

    Congratulations for your research findings. It is true that actual maximum possible will be somewhat more than mentioned in technical literature. This is also reflected by the difference in recommended values amongst various literature / standards. So, there are two terms, safe maximum value and actual maximum value!
    However, while choosing angle of maximum inclination for application engineering, the designer is handicapped by certain tolerance of uncertainties such as probable variation in material surface texture, lack of very precise data for material, monetary liability if the performance is inadequate etc. Therefore, they will generally opt for value:
    A) Which is least among various literature.
    B) Or the value as being used in existing plants, without problem.
    C) Or slightly more than the normal value if purchaser agrees to the same.

  3. #3
    Rajesh Mendirat - River Consulting, USA Guest
    I fully agrees to Mr. Mulani explanation for using the reduce angle of conveyor slope in literature. In addition to the lack of precise material data , I have also come across of the instances when the material characteristics were different after one year of mining from the same mine. So in order to take care of all these unforeseen circumstances the factor of safety is built in and which accounts of a reduce angle of conveyor slope.

    Best Wishes,
    Rajesh Mendiratta

    Fluor Daniel India Pvt. Ltd.

  4. Dr. M Rivkin,


    Further to my earlier message, you can also investigate belt sag percentage vrs maximum inclination of conveyor; for say sag value say 0.65, 1, 1.5 and 2 percentage. Possibly you may find that permissible inclination slightly increases as the percentage sag of belt (between idlers) decreases, for same value of belt speed.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 03
    Posts
    1,641
    I would always advise caution when comparing the results of some specific materials handling trials with generalised published information in "technical literature".
    My experience has shown that any piece of materials handling equipment can show significant variations in performance according the exact properties of the bulk material being tested. Indeed, if the same sample of material is used in tests over an extended period even this can result performance variations due to degredation, drying out or absorbing moisture.
    Any published data must always be treated as a guideline and not exact, not least because the publisher will not want to be held responsible if equipment does not work!
    It would be interesting if Dr Rivkin could give a fuller description of the range of bulk materials and belt sizes used in the trials.

  6. #6
    Lawrence K. Nordell

    Lawrence K. Nordell

    President and CEO

    Conveyor Dynamics Inc. [eDir]

    Conveyor Dynamics Inc.

    Professional Experience 57 Years / 11 Month Lawrence K. Nordell has 57 Years and 11 Month professional experience

    Discussions 2608 Lawrence K. Nordell acceded to 2608 discussions, Articles 0 Lawrence K. Nordell wrote 0 articles, Publications 0 Lawrence K. Nordell Nordell released 0 publications

    Searching nothing specified

    Know-How Design (1521) Lawrence K. Nordell used this tag 1521 times, Pipe Conveyor (238) Lawrence K. Nordell used this tag 238 times, Chutes (119) Lawrence K. Nordell used this tag 119 times

    Maximum Transport Angle

    A few comments on your observation:

    1. The transport distance should be a factor - short conveyors can evacuate before the sliding effect becomes significant. H. Colijn did a lot of testing using powder fudicial indicators to map the degree of backward travel the ore takes. Many attributes were tested.

    2. Loading configuation can stabilize or destabilize the load before a significant distance has been achieved -ie. your slow belt speed. As Mr. Mulani suggests the sag value can have a detrimental effect near the uphill load start point. Ore is agitated and destabilized with sag and speed and poor initial rock momentum.

    3. Degrees of surface moisture affect the result- no moisture may cause rilling or test the sliding action of the ore to belt friction, as moisture increases the cohesive and adhesive properties may increase, making for a higher inclination, as moisture is further increased, the idler agitations may again unstabilize the ore.

    4. Crossectional loading is usually adjusted by the cos (alpha)^3
    to account for the inclination load capacity correction. Alpha is the slope angle. This does not imply the other factors are moot. This comes from DIN just stated a little differently.

    5. Trough shape and spacing of idlers influence load stability

    6. Belt construction influences load stability - thinner and more flexible belts agitate and destabilize the ore, while thicker and stiffer belts reduce the effect.

    7. Calculate the rilling angle of a rock atop the center cross-section that reaches the limit of the dynamic repose angle or surcharge angle factored for the point of maximum stable inclination before the rock rolls. The is a 3-D problem. The surcharge angle, in crossection is exceded by a significant degree.

    8. It would be of interest to see the device. Then we can all render an opinion as to whether it captures the point or may be its like the whale in Moby Dick from an earlier posting.

    9. TUNRA and other Australian universities have also built vibrating tables to test inclination angles f various ores and ore properies. They do the testing as a service to the mining industry. Others around the world have done the same - Germany, USA, ....

    10. Conveyors have been designed to 22 degree inclinations before. All depends on rock properties and moisture. What angles are you recommending and with what oreproperties and what belt conditions?

    11. Change the surface configuration of the belt such as chevrons or cleats as in done. Now all the conditions are attributable to the internal granular properties of the ore.

    Lawrence Nordell
    Conveyor Dynamics, Inc.
    www.conveyor-dynamics.com

  7. #7

    How to increase the Angle of an inclined Belt

    Why do we want to increase the incline angle of an open trough belt when current typical inclines are unsafe against slide-back? The none-quantitative nature of this discussion is a good indication of the problem. Basis for safe, "maximum" inclne angles can be developed mathematically, experimentally and or emperically. The problem is that no one will accept the results because of the consequential cost. There are many high profile examples of failures in selecting a safe incline angle.

    I will share with you here:

    1.) A history that shows that this questions was investigated in depth many years ago.

    2.) A true case where a major South African Coal Company looked for the answer, found it, implemented it, and then abandoned it because of the cost.

    3. A modern proven solution, The Sandwich-Belt High-Angle Conveyor, that should make open trough inclined belts obsolete.

    Let's begin

    1.) In the 1940's A. Vierling and others investigated the incline angle problem in great depth. Basically if the dynamics could be supressed and the material to belt interface nearly elliminated then, under very controlled conditions, inclined angles could approach the materials natural angle of repose within 2 or 3 degrees. Wedging of the material load by steep V troughs helped to elliminate the material to belt interface as the weak link in the slide-back problem. Out of this work came the idea of belts with longitudinal ridges (grooves in the cover), for smaller sized materials and deep V troughs for larger sized materials. The basic question, "What is the maximum safe incline angle?", was not answered.

    2.) A major South African Coal Company had long lived with the problem of material slide backs at their inclined conveyors. These were at inclines ranging from 15 to 17 degrees. Ironically this Company demonstrated a willingness to pay for reliabilty including, typically, 100% redundacy. In the 1990's this Company decided to address the question of conveying angle once and for all. They set up a commitee of experts and conducted an exhaustive study. The conclusion; conveying angles at their open trough inclined belt indstallations shall not exceed 12 degrees. A major coal handling installation was subsequently built compling to the new edict (max incline angle of 12 degrees). The cost of this new compliant installation turned out so high that the edict of 12 degrees max angle was abandoned after only one implementation. The problem is that we don't want to know "What is the max safe angle?" because we can't stand the answer.

    As engineers we expect to develop a failure mode, determine a range of variance, then selct an appropriate safety factor against such failure. In this one case where such an approach was taken, in the end it was again abandoned.

    3.) The writer developed the Sandwich-Belt High-Angle conveyor technology, beginning in 1978, along this approach including extensive study and research, technical rationalization, and testing. The testing included, intentionally, many slide-backs, with various materials at various angles with varying hugging pressures. Suitable safety factors, against such slide-backs, were determined.

    More than 100 Sandwich-Belt High-Angle conveyors have been built pursuant to this technology. These have been for widely varying materials, at varying angles to 90 degrees (vertical), various rates beyond 6000 t/h, and various lifts to 175 meters. No material slide-back has been experienced in any commercial installation pursuant to this writers development.

    Sandwich-Belt High-Angle conveyors can completely obsolete the conventional open trough inclined conveyor if these are compared at equal levels of safety against slide back.

    Joseph A. Dos Santos, PE
    Dos Santos International
    531 Roselane St NW
    Suite 810
    Marietta, GA 30060
    USA
    Tel: 1 770 423 9895
    Fax 1 866 473 2252
    Email: jds@ dossantosintl.com
    Web Site: www.dossantosintl.com

  8. How to increase the Angle

    Our comparison was made relatevely to the maximum angle
    used in our plants for 3 different grades of potash ( fine,
    coarse and granular ).
    The experiments showed very clearly that the lower
    frequency of a belt vibration the higher slope angle for the
    tested materials. The max angle we could get was
    18.5-19 deg. It can be made by belt speed reduction,
    by the increase the distance between carrying idlers,
    so on.
    Our recommendation: if you have a material backward run problem, reduce the belt speed as the first help.

    Michael Rivkin

  9. How to increase the Angle

    The part of the experimental data was published:
    "The max incl. angle of a belt conveyor", Bulk
    Solids Handl.,vol.16,No2,pp187-192,1996.

  10. #10

    How to Increase the Angle of an Inclined Belt

    Dear Dr M.Rivkin,

    The ability to increase the angle is always qualified by various constraints such as reduced speed (which is the same as reduced capacity or increased cost for a desired rate), reduced belt sag (which means a higher belt tension basis and increased cost), reduced idler spacing, etc. Yet even with these constraints it remains a trial and error approach and no one will prescribe the rules to determine the allowed incline angle nor the minimum safety factor against slide-back, or the margin between allowed and slide-back angle (i.e. if slide-back will occur at 17 degrees then don't exceed 15 degrees etc). As I mentioned in my comments, when a major company did the in-depth study and determined the correct answer it chose the seat-of-the-pants approach because it refused to live with the up front cost of doing the right thing.

    Joseph A. Dos Santos, PE
    Dos Santos International
    531 Roselane St NW
    Suite 810
    Marietta, GA 30060
    USA
    Tel: 1 770 423 9895
    Fax 1 866 473 2252
    Email: jds@ dossantosintl.com
    Web Site: www.dossantosintl.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Belt Conveyors(Steel v/s Nylon belt)
    By Rajesh Mendiratta in forum General Aspects
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 1st April 2004, 15:28
  2. Calculating Slip Angle in Hoppers
    By Pl Gjerde in forum Pneumatic Conveying
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2nd January 2003, 9:54
  3. inclined piping in dense phase pneumatic conveying
    By Mahesh Thota in forum Pneumatic Conveying
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 6th December 2002, 16:46
  4. Angle of Conveying Testing needed
    By todds in forum Trough Belt Conveying
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 17th June 2002, 15:38
  5. Angle of Internal Friction of Cereal
    By Author in forum Silos, Hoppers, Bins, Bunkers & Domes
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11th March 2002, 11:18

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO